Skip to the content
Context
Search for:
Context
  • Categories
    Analysis article
    20
    Analysis report
    28
    Book
    2
    Byline article
    244
    Conference report
    322
    Feature article
    51
    Interview
    209
    Interview story
    3,438
    News article
    481
    Opinion article
    2
    Promo article
    7
    Session
    45
    Uncategorised
    6,408
    Vendor report
    8
  • Focuses
    Company earnings
    494
    Company funding
    401
    Company hires
    608
    Company IPO
    56
    Company M&A
    638
    Company research
    7
    Company strategy
    3,771
    Consumer indicators
    76
    Essays
    15
    Interesting
    44
    Market trends
    109
    Views of analyst
    61
    Views of executive
    3,836
  • Companies
    2,419
  • Sources
    181
  • Series
    388
  • Topics
    189
  • People
    2,427
  • Clients
    130
  1. Home
  2. Categories
  3. Uncategorised

Twitter’s Promoted Tweets Advertisers Can Squat Rivals’ Brands

By Robert Andrews
Originally published by paidContent paidContent, paidContent paidcontent:uk, paidContent paidcontent.org • 9th December 2011

Twitter apparently allows its clients to buy adverts using rivals’ brand names.

I noticed UK supermarket chain Sainsbury’s had bought ads on Twitter.com against searches for rivals like “Tesco”, “Waitrose” and “Lidl”.


Users searching Twitter.com for those brands saw Sainsbury’s Promoted Tweets, which Twitter recently started selling in the UK.

That is interesting because brand-squatting in keyword ad systems has been a contentious legal topic of late.

  • Last year, the European Court of Justice ruled that Google (NSDQ: GOOG), as an advertising vehicle, was not culpable if companies breached trademarks by placing ads against rivals’ trademarks.
  • But the court then advised Marks & Spencer individually be found liable for placing ads for its own florist service against Interflora’s brand name.
  • A French court had ruled Google liable for trademark infringement when it allowed fake Louis Vuitton goods sellers to buy AdWords using the LVMH brand’s name. But the ECJ overturned that verdict.
  • We recently reported how Lovefilm has bought Google ads for “Netflix” ahead of its rival’s UK and Ireland launch in Q1 2012.

Twitter told paidContent: “We comply with the laws of the countries in which we operate.”

paidContent contacted Sainsbury’s rivals to seek their opinion. Waitroise said: “We are aware of this. We’re not planning any action.” Others did not respond.

Sainsbury’s campaign, which was running on Twitter.com last week, has now ceased. Tesco has since bought Promoted Tweets using its own brand name…

Another company has had the same experience. “We noticed that a competitor was creating Promoted Tweets and bidding on our brand name as a keyword,” Mail Chimp’s marketer Amanda Lauter wrote back in July. “That’s not really a big deal in and of itself, since it’s the kind of thing that happens with Google Adwords all the time.

“But the content of these particular tweets was unsavory and misleading, and literally had nothing to do with MailChimp. So we did what any self-respecting brand would do, and started our own little ‘brand integrity’ Promoted Tweets campaign.”

The UK’s Advertising Standards Authority, which was recently granted regulation of online marketing, told paidContent it only regulates the content of advertisers’ own websites and can only investigate complaints made to it.

Tesco has previously asserted online rights it claims to trademarks.

CategoriesUncategorised
FocusCompany strategy
TopicAdvertising, nanopublishing, Social Media
CompanyTwitter
SourcepaidContent, paidcontent:uk, paidcontent.org
ClientContentNext


© 2025 Context