Skip to the content
Context
Search for:
Context
  • Categories
    Analysis article
    20
    Analysis report
    28
    Book
    2
    Byline article
    244
    Conference report
    322
    Feature article
    51
    Interview
    209
    Interview story
    3,438
    News article
    481
    Opinion article
    2
    Promo article
    7
    Session
    45
    Uncategorised
    6,408
    Vendor report
    8
  • Focuses
    Company earnings
    494
    Company funding
    401
    Company hires
    608
    Company IPO
    56
    Company M&A
    638
    Company research
    7
    Company strategy
    3,771
    Consumer indicators
    76
    Essays
    15
    Interesting
    44
    Market trends
    109
    Views of analyst
    61
    Views of executive
    3,836
  • Companies
    2,419
  • Sources
    181
  • Series
    388
  • Topics
    189
  • People
    2,427
  • Clients
    130
  1. Home
  2. Categories
  3. Uncategorised

Last.fm revels in its scrobbles as radio bar is raised farther

By Robert Andrews
Originally published by paidContent paidContent • 13th December 2012

The economics of personalised online radio seem as challenged as ever, with Pandora recently calling for lower royalty rates.

And now Last.fm is cutting back even further on playing tunes, as it struggles to turn a profit for owner CBS.

The service, which is celebrating its tenth anniversary currently, will in 2013 require subscription for the “radio” features of its desktop client in the US, UK and Germany, and will stop offering the service elsewhere in the world except Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland and Brazil (announcement). Curiously, web radio will remain free.

A CBS VP with Last.fm oversight told me in 2010 it hoped to turn a profit that year, but we have since received no confirmation, when asked, that has yet happened.

Last.fm introduced the £3-a-month subscriptions belatedly in March 2009 as it dawned on the industry that ad-supported music streaming could not support online businesses in the same way it does traditional radio. A year later, it abandoned on-demand music streaming — the most costly of all to license.

Instead, Last.fm is happy to advise users to listen instead through services like Spotify, which have overtaken it in the sexy stakes and inside which Last.fm now even has an app of its own. At the end of the day, why shouldn’t Last.fm charge for the same kind of service Pandora does?

With less and less music — at least, free music — Last.fm is reverting to its original core concept of tracking listening habits (or, “scrobbling”) and making connections through the data. The site is celebrating its tenth birthday by outputting historic artist and track popularity data as charts in press releases. Like a 90s boy band reforming for one last tour, if there were a more potent illustration that much of the value of Last.fm  — which CBS acquired for $280 million in 2007 — is in the past, I don’t know what it would be.

But this diminished focus is, at the same time, joyous — for, connecting data about songs and their listeners has always been Last.fm’s strong suit…

  • Any lapsed Last.fm users like me who revisit the site today will find the recommendations and gig listings based on their listening habits are excellent.
  • When experienced inside Spotify, Last.fm’s recommendations are one of the best things about the Swedish music player, which has lacked meaningful discovery features until last week’s upgrade announcement.
  • Meanwhile, the Xbox Last.fm app, free for those who subscribe to a Gold Xbox Live membership, is an excellent way to program eclectic music during parties.

Last.fm’s radio subscriptions may keep ticking over with perhaps a couple of hundred thousand subscribers. But now it’s probably time to mine the music data, not the music itself, to find Last.fm’s real value.

CategoriesUncategorised
FocusCompany strategy
TopicMusic, Social Media
CompanyLast.fm
SourcepaidContent
ClientContentNext


© 2025 Context