Skip to the content
Context
Search for:
Context
  • Categories
    Analysis article
    20
    Analysis report
    28
    Book
    2
    Byline article
    244
    Conference report
    322
    Feature article
    51
    Interview
    209
    Interview story
    3,438
    News article
    481
    Opinion article
    2
    Promo article
    7
    Session
    45
    Uncategorised
    6,408
    Vendor report
    8
  • Focuses
    Company earnings
    494
    Company funding
    401
    Company hires
    608
    Company IPO
    56
    Company M&A
    638
    Company research
    7
    Company strategy
    3,771
    Consumer indicators
    76
    Essays
    15
    Interesting
    44
    Market trends
    109
    Views of analyst
    61
    Views of executive
    3,836
  • Companies
    2,419
  • Sources
    181
  • Series
    388
  • Topics
    189
  • People
    2,427
  • Clients
    130
  1. Home
  2. Categories
  3. Article
  4. News article

Pay-for-blogging market faces questions on disclosure

By Robert Andrews
Originally published by Econsultancy Econsultancy • 3rd July 2006


PayPerPost, a new service that helps advertisers pay bloggers for writing about their products, launched a few days ago to a predictable cacophony of protest.





“Get Paid to Blog”, reads the blurb on the latest blog advertising network’s front page. “Advertisers are willing to pay you to post on topics – search through a list of topics, make a blog posting, get your content approved, and get paid. It’s that simple.”

And PayPerPost tells its affiliated advertisers: “You provide the topic, our network of bloggers create the stories and post them on their individual blogs.” Bloggers can earn $5 to $10 per post, writing about anything from loan sharks to bubble wrap.

This week’s Business Week reckons PayPerPost is “polluting the blogosphere“, while CNet says “this is a bad, bad, bad thing”: “It’s hard enough for bloggers and professional journalists to maintain their integrity as it is. PayPerPost casts a pall of doubt over everybody.”

Michael Arrington over at TechCrunch and Darren Rowse, who claims to make a six-figure salary from blogging, are amongst the rest of the naysayers, who criticise the fact that making disclosure on the payola is optional while all posts are screened by an editor before cash is handed over. PayPerPost has even apparently offered inducements to bloggers to write reports countering the ensuing negativity.

Now lets be honest, you can see the logic in this idea. I’m as much a blog purist as the next man, but several times we’ve seen companies wade into the blogosphere with poor or offensive strategies that get nobody nowhere. Would you rather another such calamity a la Cillit Bang or L’Oreal?

Celebrated blog marketer Hugh Macleod won admirers for his strategy of giving 100 bottles of Stormhoek wine to bloggers for review (good or bad), and ended up doubling sales in 12 months. I don’t know about you but, where I’m from, free wine is considered inducement.

Maybe there’s something more honest about companies having to pay us for our views?

Without disclosure, this latest move blurs the line between advertising and editorial. Newspapers and magazines in the UK are allowed to carry advertorials placed by marketers and presented in the house layout style – but there are strict guidelines requiring publications to flag the features as paid content.

My advice to interested bloggers? Treat it like a review – do the writing, give your usual honest spin, place a prominent disclosure, take the money and run; then resume normal service.

CategoriesNews article
TopicSocial Media, Weblogs
SourceEconsultancy
ClientEconsultancy


© 2025 Context