Skip to the content
Context
Search for:
Context
  • Categories
    Analysis article
    20
    Analysis report
    28
    Book
    2
    Byline article
    244
    Conference report
    322
    Feature article
    51
    Interview
    209
    Interview story
    3,438
    News article
    481
    Opinion article
    2
    Promo article
    7
    Session
    45
    Uncategorised
    6,408
    Vendor report
    8
  • Focuses
    Company earnings
    494
    Company funding
    401
    Company hires
    608
    Company IPO
    56
    Company M&A
    638
    Company research
    7
    Company strategy
    3,771
    Consumer indicators
    76
    Essays
    15
    Interesting
    44
    Market trends
    109
    Views of analyst
    61
    Views of executive
    3,836
  • Companies
    2,419
  • Sources
    181
  • Series
    388
  • Topics
    189
  • People
    2,427
  • Clients
    130
  1. Home
  2. Categories
  3. Article
  4. Byline article

Twitter’s M&A strategy: Ecosystem has nothing to fear from ad-tech spending spree

By Jamie Riddell, Birdsong Analytics
Originally published by iMediaConnection • 16th May 2017

Build or buy? That is the age-old question for many a powerful tech outfit.

In Twitter’s case, the answer is clear. Fresh from raising $2.1bn in its IPO, the micro-messaging platform has stepped up its journey on the acquisitions trail.

In buying ad server MoPub, native ad platform Namo and ad retargeting TapCommerce, Twitter’s M&A strategy is clear – it is acquiring smaller vendors from specific areas of its own ecosystem to support a big push for mobile advertising dominance.

This raises some interesting questions. If a select few developers who depend on Twitter are brought in-house through acquisition, what happens to their many third-party rivals, who remain on the outside? Now that Twitter owns BlueFin Labs, Bristol’s SecondSync and Trendrr, why would marketers use an equivalent but more distant social TV analytics service like Canvs, Kimola or even Nielsen, all of which now enjoy second-division access to Twitter’s vital API?

That question is thrown into sharp relief because, when it comes to freezing out third-party developers, Twitter has form. A year ago, many independent Twitter apps were wiped out when the company severely restricted developer access to its platform. The move concentrated the official Twitter mobile client as the app of choice.

Mobile, social advertising is exploding, with many analytics and ad sales platforms sprouting up. By bolting on a hand-picked few of them, GoBot-style, to make its own mobile ad offering more powerful, will Twitter again kill off independent peers in its ecosystem? If Twitter bought a social analytics platform tomorrow, would the company I am spending my life building be worthless?

I don’t think so. It’s a tech cliché now, but nothing online is a zero-sum gum. We have been here before – Google revolutionised the industry by introducing self-service online advertising; but that didn’t kill ad agencies. Nor did its purchase of Urchin, the forerunner to Google Analytics, limit the opportunities for a web analytics sector that still includes popular services from the likes of Adobe and Clicky.

We should welcome, not fear, Twitter’s ad-tech buy-up spree. Its acquisitions of mobile marketing services validate the entire sector, and will help create greater overall value for all of us. It doesn’t mean the growing ecosystem of Twitter-dependent businesses is going anywhere any time soon.

CategoriesByline article
FocusCompany M&A, Views of executive
CompanyBirdsong Analytics
PersonJamie Riddell
SourceiMediaConnection
ClientBirdsong Analytics


© 2025 Context