Skip to the content
Context
Search for:
Context
  • Categories
    Analysis article
    20
    Analysis report
    28
    Book
    2
    Byline article
    244
    Conference report
    322
    Feature article
    51
    Interview
    209
    Interview story
    3,438
    News article
    481
    Opinion article
    2
    Promo article
    7
    Session
    45
    Uncategorised
    6,408
    Vendor report
    8
  • Focuses
    Company earnings
    494
    Company funding
    401
    Company hires
    608
    Company IPO
    56
    Company M&A
    638
    Company research
    7
    Company strategy
    3,771
    Consumer indicators
    76
    Essays
    15
    Interesting
    44
    Market trends
    109
    Views of analyst
    61
    Views of executive
    3,836
  • Companies
    2,419
  • Sources
    181
  • Series
    388
  • Topics
    189
  • People
    2,427
  • Clients
    130
  1. Home
  2. Categories
  3. Article
  4. Conference report

@ 3GSM: Carriers Scored Own-Goal On Soccer World Cup; Mobile Video Not A Good Sport Play

By Robert Andrews
Originally published by moconews, paidContent paidContent • 14th February 2007

British network operators botched mobile offerings introduced for last summer’s soccer World Cup, 3GSM attendees heard Wednesday in Barcelona. The tournament is among the world’s most-watched and most lucrative sporting events, but Paul Nerger of mobile analysis firm Argogroup said the networks failed to deliver. Nerger: “Most of the operators in the UK provided a text alert service so that you would know your team had scored; most of them offered the ability to actually see live video. What we found was that, in most cases, most of the operators were very, very slow at delivering those notifications. In some cases, notifications of goals scores might have been anywhere from 30 minutes to three hours late. For a sports fan, that’s generally not acceptable. Ironically enough, if you had gone to the Fifa site and subscribed to their notification service, they often actually arrived sooner, even though they might have used the same network operator to deliver them.”

He added: “Videos were pay-for fees but to actually see what the goal looked like through shrinking videos, the loss was often below the threshold where you could actually see the ball. Video, if you look at sports, is one of the things that is going to make content services compelling – it’s one of the things that a lot of people are invested in. [But] if you don’t deliver that, you don’t have a positive user experience. When you are charging money for that experience, it better work or they are not going to come back.”

Despite industry optimism about emerging prospects for delivering video to handsets, Nerger’s counterparts on a panel about sporting mobile content echoed his views. When I asked them, each expressed a high degree of negativity about that medium, mobile soccer coverage and mobile offerings for this fall’s upcoming Rugby World Cup in France, instead advocating downloadable wallpapers and ringtones.

“The one sport we lose money on is football,” said Pete Russell, CEO of sport-centric English mobile content provider Player One, for example. “Football has never worked for us from a quality perspective, it’s not great. Cricket works because there’s a multitude of camera angles.” Yet the mobisode rights for cricket’s recent Ashes series proved not to be lucrative for Russell thanks to England’s 5-0 whitewash at the hands of Australia.

Even Darach Deeha, CEO of Servecast, which delivers streaming video to sporting stakeholders including Manchester United, was at pains to suggest “long-play” sports are better suited to mobile devices than one-offs because fans can consume content in a drip-feed fashion.

CategoriesConference report
Topicentertainment, media & publishing, Social Media, Sport, Television
Companyworld cup
Event3GSM 2007
Sourcemoconews, paidContent
ClientContentNext


© 2025 Context