Skip to the content
Context
Search for:
Context
  • Categories
    Analysis article
    20
    Analysis report
    28
    Book
    2
    Byline article
    244
    Conference report
    322
    Feature article
    51
    Interview
    209
    Interview story
    3,438
    News article
    481
    Opinion article
    2
    Promo article
    7
    Session
    45
    Uncategorised
    6,408
    Vendor report
    8
  • Focuses
    Company earnings
    494
    Company funding
    401
    Company hires
    608
    Company IPO
    56
    Company M&A
    638
    Company research
    7
    Company strategy
    3,771
    Consumer indicators
    76
    Essays
    15
    Interesting
    44
    Market trends
    109
    Views of analyst
    61
    Views of executive
    3,836
  • Companies
    2,419
  • Sources
    181
  • Series
    388
  • Topics
    189
  • People
    2,427
  • Clients
    130
  1. Home
  2. Categories
  3. Article
  4. News article

‘Parasite’ invites advertisers to game Digg

By Robert Andrews
Originally published by Econsultancy Econsultancy • 3rd April 2007

A new ‘black market’ service that allows advertisers to pay for influence on social networks has attracted criticism from the blogging community.

Subvert And Profit is quite upfront about its business model – advertisers pay $1 per vote on the Digg social news bookmarking site. Such activity can attract considerable attention for products and services.

The enterprise is trying to attract an army of Diggers to perform the votes on its behalf. It says it will pay $0.50 for each vote they make on an advertiser’s behalf.

“We are a new kind of black market,” the homepage admits.

“Violating Digg’s terms of use is not illegal. Digg can, however, delete your account if you violate its terms of use. We encourage you to violate Digg’s terms of use at your own risk.”

Subvert And Profit is not the first service to offer to game social media ecosystems. A magazine feature last month lifted the lid on several techniques. But the new focus has brought more criticism to the door of the latest entrant.

Online marketer Blonde 2.0 said Subvert And Profit was “abusing the democracy of Web 2.0”:

“It is one thing to promote a product you use, like, and think can be useful to your community. It is another thing to digg a story for a product you don’t even know just to get hard cold cash.”

Valleywag blogger Nick Douglas said the outfit is doomed to failure.

But the operatives behind Subvert And Profit are either unrepentant or taking an April Fool too far:

“While we are parasites, we do not wish to kill our hosts. Furthermore, the democracy of Web 2.0 is already hacked, rigged, and flawed enough for our impact to go unnoticed.”

CategoriesNews article
FocusCompany strategy
TopicSocial Media, Web 2.0
CompanyWeird Wild Web
SourceEconsultancy
ClientEconsultancy


© 2025 Context